Frequency: 1 issue/year
Founded in 1927, Studi Etruschi is a publication of the Istituto Nazionale di Studi Etruschi ed Italici (Firenze). Studi Etruschi is the world’s most distinguished and widely distributed peer-reviewed journal on Etruscology and Italic Studies. The scientific focus lies on all areas of research and study related to Etruscan and pre-Roman Italy. The journal further includes two epigraphic reviews (Rassegna di epigrafia etrusca e italica). Studi Etruschi reaches more than 25 countries and approximately 300 universities, learned societies, departments of antiquities, and museums. The current Editor-in-Chief is Giuseppe Sassatelli.
Studi Etruschi is published yearly in October/November, in print and electronic formats and is available through subscription and non-subscriptions access options. The journal evaluates manuscripts through a double-blind peer review process. Every issue includes new scholarly work as well as a book review section, which provides a critical overview of new publications by emerging and established scholars.
Editorial board and Contact us
Editor in Chief
Giuseppe Sassatelli: email@example.com
Marina Martelli Cristofani
Maria Chiara Bettini
Book Reviews Editorial Office
Istituto Nazionale di Studi Etruschi ed Italici
Via Romana 37/A - 50125 Firenze
Tel. e fax: +39.055.2207175
Rassegna di epigrafia etrusca (REE):
Prof. Luciano Agostiniani
Prof. Giovanni Colonna
Prof. Adriano Maggiani
Rassegna di epigrafia italica (REI):
Prof. Luciano Agostiniani
Prof.ssa Maria Marchese
Prof.ssa Anna Marinetti
Giorgio Bretschneider Editore
Piazza Antonio Mancini 4
Production and Publication Office:
La selezione dei contributi da pubblicare avviene tramite il sistema della Peer-Review: i contributi pervenuti vengono sottoposti in forma anonima a valutazione di due esperti reclutati per l’occasione, a seconda del tema trattato nell’articolo.
L’identità dei revisori è resa nota con cadenza biennale tramite pubblicazione nel sito della rivista senza esplicitare i contributi per cui è stato effettuato il referaggio. La documentazione relativa ai referaggi viene custodita, sotto forma di schede, negli archivi dell’Istituto.
Informazioni per gli autori
Per facilitare il lavoro di redazione e garantire l’uniformità dei testi, gli Autori sono pregati di attenersi strettamente alle seguenti norme.
I testi vanno inoltrati elettronicamente al seguente indirizzo email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Gli Autori sono pregati di attenersi strettamente alle norme redazionali scaricabili da questo link. Esse si compongono di 2 files:
1. Le norme redazionali di Studi Etruschi
2. Le abbreviazioni bibliografiche
Per la composizione del testo si raccomanda di usare programmi di video-scrittura di ampia diffusione (per es. Microsoft Word o compatibili), utilizzando il font Times New Roman, dimensioni carattere 12, interlinea semplice.
Ai sensi del Decreto Legislativo 22 gennaio 2004, n. 42 (Codice Beni Culturali) nessuna immagine fotografica può essere pubblicata o comunque riprodotta senza una concessione scritta rilasciata dall’ente titolare dei diritti di riproduzione. Nelle referenze fotografiche dovrà essere chiaramente indicato il copyright dell’Ente titolare (Soprintendenze, Musei ecc.) dei diritti di riproduzione.
Le figure devono essere in sequenza continua senza distinzione tra figure e tavole perché andranno tutte all’interno dell’articolo con un’unica numerazione progressiva.
Le illustrazioni, di buona qualità, devono essere fornite in versione elettronica (si prega di fornire file con estensione jpg o tiff ad alta risoluzione). Si accettano illustrazioni in B/N, nel numero di 1 per ogni pagina di testo (per es.: un articolo di venti pagine può essere corredato da circa 20 illustrazioni). Le fotografie devono avere una risoluzione di almeno 300 dpi; i disegni al tratto di almeno 400 dpi. Non sono ammesse, salvo eccezioni debitamente motivate, illustrazioni a colori.
Le immagini potranno avere una larghezza massima di 13 cm: si prega pertanto di indicare per quali illustrazioni è desiderata questa larghezza massima, in caso contrario le immagini saranno impaginate dall’editore secondo convenienza, con una larghezza compresa fra 7 e 13 cm.
DIDASCALIE DELLE ILLUSTRAZIONI
Esse vanno fornite in elenco in calce al testo. Le informazioni devono essere le seguenti: definizione dell’oggetto (per es. oinochoe di bucchero) oppure breve descrizione del luogo (Cerveteri, Santuario della Vigna Parrocchiale, ecc) + eventuale luogo di provenienza dell’oggetto + eventuale luogo di conservazione dell’oggetto (per es. Roma, Museo Nazionale Etrusco di Villa Giulia) + eventuale n. di inventario dell’oggetto).
Nelle referenze fotografiche dovrà essere chiaramente indicato il copyright della Soprintendenza, il nome del Museo o della Raccolta ed eventualmente il nome del fotografo. La precisa referenza è indicata nella concessione rilasciata dall’Ente concessionario. L’Editore non risponde dell’inosservanza, anche parziale, di questa norma.
Per ulteriori informazioni, contattare la Redazione della Rivista all'indirizzo: email@example.com
Bretschneider offers Studi Etruschi Institutional and Individual subscriptions in formats Print only
• Download our 2023 Rate Sheet (pdf)
Print only includes shipping costs
* Extra EU shipment: € 18,00
Payment must be in Euro
By Cred it Card (Paypal)
Visa, MasterCard accepted. Please note that sending your credit card information by email is a violation of our PCI compliance rules – emails containing credit card numbers are automatically deleted by our servers.
Make check payable to Giorgio Bretschneider Editore S.r.l. Piazza Antonio Mancini 4, 00196 Roma (Italy) Checks must be drawn on banks located in Europe.
By Wire Transfer
Payment must be in Euro. Checks and money orders should be made payable to Giorgio Bretschneider Editore srl. Checks must be drawn on banks located in Europe.
Subscribers may submit payment via wire transfer.
(Note there is an Euro 12 fee for wire payments from non-EU destinations)
Bank information is:
Agency: Roma Cola di Rienzo (36012)
Account Name: Giorgio Bretschneider Editore srl
Account Number: 000401005810
DUTIES OF EDITORS
Fair play and editorial independence
Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study’s validity, clarity) and its relevance to the journal’s scope, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy or institutional affiliation. Decisions to edit and publish are not determined by the policies of governments or any other agencies outside of the journal itself. The Editor-in-Chief has full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication of that content.
Editors and editorial staff will not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Editors and editorial board members will not use unpublished information disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their own research purposes without the authors’ explicit written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained by editors as a result of handling the manuscript will be kept confidential and not used for their personal advantage. Editors will recuse themselves from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships/connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions connected to the papers; instead, they will ask another member of the editorial board to handle the manuscript.
The editors ensure that all submitted manuscripts being considered for publication undergo peer-review by at least two reviewers who are expert in the field. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for deciding which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal will be published, based on the validation of the work in question, its importance to researchers and readers, the reviewers’ comments, and such legal requirements as are currently in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor-in-Chief may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Involvement and cooperation in investigations
Editors (in conjunction with the publisher and/or society) will take responsive measures when ethical concerns are raised with regard to a submitted manuscript or published paper. Every reported act of unethical publishing behaviour will be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication.
DUTIES OF REVIEWERS
Contribution to editorial decisions
Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communications with authors, may assist authors in improving their manuscripts. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication and lies at the heart of scientific endeavour. STUDI ETRUSCHI shares the view of many that all scholars who wish to contribute to the scientific process have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.
Any invited referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should immediately notify the editors and decline the invitation to review so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.
Any manuscripts received for review are confidential documents and must be treated as such; they must not be shown to or discussed with others except if authorized by the Editor-in-Chief (who would only do so under exceptional and specific circumstances). This applies also to invited reviewers who decline the review invitation
Standards of objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively and observations formulated clearly with supporting arguments so that authors can use them for improving the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors is inappropriate.
Acknowledgement of sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that is an observation, derivation or argument that has been reported in previous publications should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also notify the editors of any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Any invited referee who has conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions connected to the manuscript and the work described therein should immediately notify the editors to declare their conflicts of interest and decline the invitation to review so that alternative reviewers can be contacted. Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the authors. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for the reviewer’s personal advantage. This applies also to invited reviewers who decline the review invitation.
DUTIES OF AUTHORS
Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed and the results, followed by an objective discussion of the significance of the work. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Review articles should be accurate, objective and comprehensive, while editorial 'opinion' or perspective pieces should be clearly identified as such. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Data access and retention
Authors may be asked to provide the raw data of their study together with the manuscript for editorial review and should be prepared to make the data publicly available if practicable. In any event, authors should ensure accessibility of such data to other competent professionals for at least 10 years after publication (preferably via an institutional or subject-based data repository or other data centre), provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and legal rights concerning proprietary data do not preclude their release.
Originality and plagiarism
Authors should ensure that they have written and submit only entirely original works, and if they have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited. Publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported in the manuscript should also be cited. Plagiarism takes many forms, from "passing off" another's paper as the author's own, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Multiple, duplicate, redundant or concurrent submission/publication
Papers describing essentially the same research should not be published in more than one journal or primary publication. Hence, authors should not submit for consideration a manuscript that has already been published in another journal. Submission of a manuscript concurrently to more than one journal is unethical publishing behaviour and unacceptable.
The publication of some kinds of articles (such as guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided that certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.
Authorship of the manuscript
Only persons who meet these authorship criteria should be listed as authors in the manuscript as they must be able to take public responsibility for the content: (i) made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, data acquisition, or analysis/interpretation of the study; and (ii) drafted the manuscript or revised it critically for important intellectual content; and (iii) have seen and approved the final version of the paper and agreed to its submission for publication. All persons who made substantial contributions to the work reported in the manuscript (such as technical help, writing and editing assistance, general support) but who do not meet the criteria for authorship must not be listed as an author, but should be acknowledged in the "Acknowledgements" section after their written permission to be named as been obtained. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate coauthors (according to the above definition) and no inappropriate coauthors are included in the author list and verify that all coauthors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Authors should – at the earliest stage possible (generally by submitting a disclosure form at the time of submission and including a statement in the manuscript) – disclose any conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or their interpretation in the manuscript. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that should be disclosed include financial ones such as honoraria, educational grants or other funding, participation in speakers’ bureaus, membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest, and paid expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements, as well as non-financial ones such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs in the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. All sources of financial support for the work should be disclosed (including the grant number or other reference number if any).
Acknowledgement of sources
Authors should ensure that they have properly acknowledged the work of others, and should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately (from conversation, correspondence or discussion with third parties) must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Authors should not use information obtained in the course of providing confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, unless they have obtained the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.
Authors are obliged to participate in the peer review process and cooperate fully by responding promptly to editors’ requests for raw data, clarifications, and proof of ethics approval, patient consents and copyright permissions. In the case of a first decision of "revisions necessary", authors should respond to the reviewers’ comments systematically, point by point, and in a timely manner, revising and re-submitting their manuscript to the journal by the deadline given.
Fundamental errors in published works
When authors discover significant errors or inaccuracies in their own published work, it is their obligation to promptly notify the journal’s editors or publisher and cooperate with them to either correct the paper in the form of an erratum or to retract the paper. If the editors or publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error or inaccuracy, then it is the authors’ obligation to promptly correct or retract the paper or provide evidence to the journal editors of the correctness of the paper.
DUTIES OF THE PUBLISHER
Handling of unethical publishing behaviour
In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism, the publisher, in close collaboration with the editors, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question. This includes the prompt publication of an erratum, clarification or, in the most severe case, the retraction of the affected work. The publisher, together with the editors, shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred, and under no circumstances encourage such misconduct or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place.
Access to journal content
The publisher is committed to the permanent availability and preservation of scholarly research and ensures accessibility by partnering with organizations and maintaining our own digital archive.
Politiche di copyright
Gli articoli proposti e accettati per la loro pubblicazione nelle riviste Giorgio Bretschneider Editore sono editi, in versione cartacea e elettronica, senza alcun onere economico a carico dell’autore o delle istituzioni ad esso afferenti.
Ogni autore è l’unico proprietario dei diritti di autore e scientifici della propria opera, e può, immediatamente dopo la pubblicazione e senza alcun embargo temporale, condividere liberamente il proprio manoscritto, in word o in altro formato, nella versione da lui originariamente proposta e consegnata per la pubblicazione – cioè senza la nostra elaborazione, impaginazione –, in green open access, in siti internet o archivi online o repositories.
Ogni autore riceve contrattualmente in forma gratuita dalla Giorgio Bretschneider Editore, come estratto elettronico, il PDF della versione finale, elaborata, revisionata, accettata, impaginata ed edita, della propria pubblicazione per il solo uso strettamente personale. Questo PDF, coperto da copyright, è di proprietà della casa editrice in quanto elaborato, revisionato e impaginato a cura e ad opera della Giorgio Bretschneider Editore, al fine di essere utilizzato esclusivamente nelle proprie pubblicazioni editoriali cartacee e online, e contrattualmente può, in tutto o in parte, con l’autorizzazione scritta della casa editrice, essere caricato in accesso chiuso in depositi, archivi o repositories online.
Qualsiasi forma di auto archiviazione deve menzionare il © Giorgio Bretschneider Editore e il codice DOI.